We are all, I guess, familiar with the parable of ‘the good Samaritan’. If we were asked its point we would probably say it illustrates ‘neighbourliness’. And we would be right. Jesus says as much in his punchline question. Here is Luke’s record of the parable.
Luke 10:25-37 (ESV)
And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” He said to him, “What is written in the Law? How do you read it?” And he answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” And he said to him, “You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live.” But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?” Jesus replied, “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who stripped him and beat him and departed, leaving him half dead. Now by chance a priest was going down that road, and when he saw him he passed by on the other side. So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. He went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he set him on his own animal and brought him to an inn and took care of him. And the next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, ‘Take care of him, and whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.’ Which of these three, do you think, proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?” He said, “The one who showed him mercy.” And Jesus said to him, “You go, and do likewise.”
But there is more going on in this parable than a simple definition of neighbourliness. Jesus’ interrogator was a lawyer, an exponent of Jewish Law. For him the Law was everything. Eternal life was earned by law-keeping (and so his question… what must I do…). The Law, he knew, required love for God and neighbour; it said ‘this do and live’. And Jesus agrees, it does. The lawyer then does what all do who try to avoid responsibility before hard facts; he asks an evasive question, ‘who is my neighbour’. Perhaps he already saw the impossibility of law-keeping. Certainly this is the first conclusion to which the parable narrative leads.
Those who boast in the law do not keep the Law. Both the priest and the Levite (two of the main products, exponents and models of the Law in Israel) show no mercy or compassion to the injured man. Law does not make men compassionate and neighbourly. Laws, institutions, and commands could not produce neighbourliness. For sure, the priest and Levite knew they ought to help, but didn’t. Mere law never produces a compassionate heart and so could never lead to eternal life. Do this and live is a counsel of despair for sinners. The Law merely exposes sin it does not lead to obedience.
So how does the narrative progress? Does Jesus instead call for faith in him? Sometimes he does, but not in this instance. Instead he indicates the only route through which ‘neighbour-love’ is achieved and it is completely apart from law. He introduces a character who had nothing to do with the law – a Samaritan. He is ‘moved with compassion’ and does all that is needed for the half-dead man. And he is impressing that only grace at work in a human heart will produce neighbour-love. The Samaritan does not know the Law but he has the heart of God. For God is compassionate and merciful. Grace has given him the life of God in his soul and so he loves and acts. He doesn’t ask if the injured man deserves help. He doesn’t ask if he has an obligation to help. Love simply sees the need and reaches out to help. This is the power of grace in the heart. Whatever the need grace sees it and reaches out to help.
Law simply makes the heart look for excuses; it asks legalistic questions like ‘who is my neighbour’. It looks for ways to do the bare minimum. Law gives no desire, no love, no motivation, no power. Grace, however, renews the heart and gives motive and strength. Grace creates a heart that loves as God loves. Grace bestows what law demands but can never achieve. Eternal life is a product of grace: it is not the result of neighbour-love but results in neighbour-love. It is those who are renewed in grace by the Spirit who fulfil ‘the just requirement of the Law’(Roms 8:1-4).
Finally, it would be a mistake to drag into this parable what it is not addressing. Jesus’ is not saying here that any who show kindness to another are Christians. This is simply not the issue of the conversation. His point is simply the redundancy of Law as a means of neighbour-love and the primacy of grace.
Of course, the true revelation of grace, the true ‘good Samaritan’, is Jesus. He is the only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth. He was God revealed in flesh, in compassion and goodness, and what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God has done through Jesus (Roms 8). Jesus fulfils the Law but he is much more than the Law. He is the heart of God revealed in grace healing the sick, freeing the prisoners, enabling the blind to see, binding up the broken-hearted, preaching good news to the poor (Isa 61). He will reach out in love to the needy not because he must, or because they deserve it, but because this is how grace acts. It is while we were sinners and without strength Christ died for the ungodly (Roms 5). Grace sees the need and acts.
Grace alone makes ‘good Samaritans’ and makes them of all God’s people.
Awesome, John.
„Law gives no desire, no love, no motivation. Grace, however, renews the heart and gives motive and strength. Grace creates a heart that loves as God loves. Grace bestows what law demands but can never achieve. Eternal life is a product of grace: it is not the result of neighbour-love but results in neighbour-love. It is those who are renewed in grace by the Spirit who fulfil ‘the just requirement of the Law’(Roms 8:1-4).”
Law and Grace – perfectly defined and parted from each other. But my copy of your words was only a short example for your mature insightfulness.
Hats off to John Thomson, the author of this God-inspired blog post!
Susanne
Susanne
Thanks again for commenting so positively, even if your words are far too kind.
No, John.
You are too modest!
Susanne
such a simple yet profound message you preached. indeed. John means grace, your parents are indeed blessed when they named you John.
I’ve recalled the “two great faith” Jesus mentioned. both were gentiles.. they knew nothing of the Law, yet have become great faith.
“For if they that are of the law are heirs, FAITH IS MADE VOID, and the promise is made of none effect”
- Romans 4:14
@”Eternal life is a product of grace: it is not the result of neighbour-love but results in neighbour-love”
- this is going to resound in days to come…
- such a revelation..thank you for sharing
“I do not set aside the grace of God; for if righteousness is by law, then Christ has died for nothing”
- Galatians 2:21
grace and peace
savedbygrace
Thankyou for positive comments.
John,
Off-topic response.
But I would like to say something that is very important for me, namely,
“Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your encouraging support yesterday. Your caring assistance helped me so much. I’m still deeply moved. Thanks again, John.”
Be richly blessed,
Susanne
No problem Susanne. It is frustrating when we seem to be accused of what we are not saying.
You are so right, John. Frustration about “this” is a very proper wording.
Hi John,
I want to share two more things with you.
I’ve just read what you wrote about our lives hidden in Christ. Perfectly outlined and illustrated, but I’m afraid that you were misunderstood again. It’s maddening!
Yesterday in the evening I wanted to write a comment on “Biblical Balance” because I fear for quite some time now that it can become dangerous to overstress the “It is finished” part of the Gospel while simultaneously neglecting the believer’s part. If one is crushed in spirit he/she will need this kind of Gospel preaching alone. But what about those who hear the same message throughout the years – those who persist in living their life quite unconscious of their rude behaviour towards other sheep? What they need – in my opinion – is to be charged with quite a portion of God’s wrath, exhortations, teachings on the Last Judgement and an unmistakable broad hint that nobody is counted among the Elect who refuses to obey Christ, i.e., the commandment “Love your neighbour as yourself in order to fulfil the law.” For many are called, but few are chosen. Repentance for those will be essential for their eternal life. But they always insist on being sinners. I’m rather sure that they do misunderstand Luther completely.
And now you have it: as soon as I wanted to write about my deliberations, God whispered in my ear, “Forget it – I shall do it.” So I switched off the computer and went to bed. While reading your comment on biblically balanced preaching today, my heart was burning all the time and I heard (read) what God wanted to be said. Honestly, my heart leaped with joy considering God’s unpredictable guidance of our human hearts.
What a wonderful God!
Hi Susanne
I totally agree with you. The pastoral need determines the aspect of truth stressed. The tragedy is that opposing any experience of God in Christ presently at the very least robs those who do so of some of the joy that can be theirs. Sins forgiven and a righteous verdict is an important part of the blessings that ours in Christ, but only a part. The greatest blessing is Christ himself and feeding on him.
I’ve not yet read any of the responses but I am not surprised that I am being misunderstood. I agree, from what I understand of Luther (through reading his commentary on Galatians) he would not agree. I find it astonishing that any can read Scripture and miss all the exhortations to holiness or write them off as merely legalistic demands. On the whole I try to make positive comments on Tuulian’s blog, or at least try to frame my comments in as positive a way as possible, though sometimes I fail and sometimes its not possible. I keep commenting because I do fear that an unbiblical onesidedness is dangerous.
Take care.
Hi John,
The second part of our “lives hidden with Christ in God” you wrote yesterday directly speaks to me from the heart. You again put it very well and I fully agree with you. The way you described our life solely consisting of looking at and living for Him brightly illuminates the path we should walk on throughout this whole earthly life. Quoting you,
“He will no longer live for family, money, security, status, sport and hobbies, and everything that we value in this world (he may use them wisely when necessary and enjoy them in so doing) but these will not hold his heart and make him tick. What holds his heart is in heaven. It is there his life now and future lies. For this he will live.”
There’s no better way to express it that everyone can understand. BTW, you chose a very careful and diplomatic phrasing, very pleasing to read. But I stop making compliments now, otherwise you might think again I exaggerate, however, I don’t. At all.
Susanne
Thanks Susanne.